Michael Idinopulos’s latest post on Transparent Office compares two different responses about Enterprise 2.0 adoption.
One of the statements being compared is from Stowe Boyd’s post:
I disagree with the notion that Enterprise 2.0 is about groups not the individual. On the contrary: Web 2.0 is based on the person and personal relationships in networks, not group membership.
The 2nd post compared is from Michael Idinopulos himself:
Enterprise 2.0 posits the group as the primary unit of activity; email posits the individual
What’s your take on it? Is enterprise 2.0 about the group or the individual?
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(237)
-
▼
October
(20)
- Enterprise Software Purchasing
- Shaking Things up With Alfresco Enterprise 3.0
- LinkedIn Launches “Enterprise” Applications
- Small Business Owners and Social Media
- SOA Predictions for the New Year
- FriendFeed testing enterprise friendly function
- Apple's move into the enterprise scene
- Corporate Social Networks according to Robert Scoble
- Egnyte a new way to embrace Enterprise 2.0
- Web Seminar: "Core Concepts to Portal Strategy"
- Near-Time Updates for Enterprise 2.0
- Enterprise 2.0 Tools Will See Price Drop
- Enterprise Search Merged with Business Intelligence
- Enterprise 2.0: Is it about Groups or the Individual?
- BlackBerry Goes Touch-Screen
- IBM is Bringing Business Networking Closer with Bl...
- Windows Vista: An Enterprise Failure
- Enterprise 2.0 could be the answers in today's stu...
- Coldwell Banker embraces IPhone
- How to Improve Enterprise Technology Projects
-
▼
October
(20)
No comments:
Post a Comment